Prof. Dr. Peter Auer (Universität Freiburg i.Br.)
Blickverhalten bei Gesprächen im Gehen
Donnerstag, 29. Nov 2018, 16:15 Uhr bis 18:00 Uhr
Dr. Philippe Maurer (Universität Zürich)
Tuatschin - A Sursilvan Romansh dialect
Thursday, 15. Nov 2018, 16:15 to 18:00
Prof. Dr. Ellen Fricke (TU Chemnitz)
Deixis und multimodale Raumkonstruktion als interaktiver Zeichenprozess
Thursday, 1. Nov 2018, 16:15 to 18:00
Prof. Dr. Arnulf Deppermann (IDS Mannheim)
Raumreferenz als flexible Praktik: Zur Adaptation von Sprache und Gestik an die räumliche Konstellation von Sprecher-Adressat-Referenzobjekt
Thursday, 18. October 2018, 16:15 to 18:00
Prof. Dr. Martin Pickering (University of Edinburgh)
Understanding dialogue: Language use and social interaction
Thursday, 4. October 2018 , 16:15 to 18:00
We present a theory of dialogue as a form of cooperative joint activity. Dialogue is treated as a system involving two interlocutors and a shared workspace that contains their contributions and relevant non-linguistic context. The interlocutors construct shared plans and use them to "post" contributions to the workspace, to comprehend joint contributions, and to distribute control of the dialogue between them. A fundamental part of this process is to simulate their partners contributions and to use it to predict the upcoming state of the shared workspace. As a consequence, they align their linguistic representations and their representations of the situation and of the "games" underlying successful communication. The shared workspace is a highly limited resource, and the interlocutors use their aligned representations to say just enough and to speak in good time. We end by applying the account beyond the "minimal dyad" to augmented dialogue, multi-party dialogue, and monologue.
Dr. Patti Adank (University College London)
The role of motor cortex in speech perception
Thursday, 31. May 2018, 16:15 to 18:00
Human motor circuits are active during speech perception. However, the precise conditions under which the motor system is active during speech perception are not clear. Two current accounts make distinct predictions for how listening to speech engages speech motor representations. The first account suggests that the motor system is most strongly activated when observing familiar actions while a second account asserts that motor excitability is greatest when observing less familiar, ambiguous actions. I will first discuss how we investigated these predictions using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) by measuring Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) in lip and hand motor cortex. Second, I will discuss an experiment in which we aimed to further clarify the precise nature of activation of articulatory motor representations during speech perception. Firstly, it is unknown whether speech motor activity is preferentially engaged when perceiving forms of motor-based signal distortion (form dependent), or if motor activity is facilitated whenever perception is challenged, irrespective of the source of the difficulty (form independent). Third, it is unknown whether and how speech motor facilitation during speech perception is moderated by hearing ability, despite hearing sensitivity being paramount to understanding speech in challenging conditions. We investigated these questions in a final MEP experiment including younger and older listeners.
Prof. Dr. Geert Brône (KU Leuven)
Die Koordination von Blickverhalten in der Interaktion. Eine Eye-Tracking-Studie zu Feedback und Feedbackelizitierung in triadischen Gesprächen
Thursday, 12. April 2018, 16:15 to 18:00
Prof. Dr. Gerhard Jäger (Universität Tübingen)
Typologies in equilibrium
Thursday, 15. March 2018, 16:15 to 18:00
In a landmark paper, Maslova (2000) argued that the synchronous frequencies of a typological variable do not reveal distributional universals. As there is no guarantee that the underlying dynamic process has reached equilibrium, observed frequencies may
reflect properties of ancestor languages rather than functional tendencies. As a remedy, Maslova proposes to estimate the transition rates between types from diachronic data and to compute the equilibrium distribution analytically instead.
Probably due to the sparsity of diachronic typological evidence, this program has not been realized so far. Techniques from the *phylogenetic comparative method* (cf. Nunn, 2011) in computational biology, however, paired with the newly available electronic typological data sources, afford an alternative way to realized Maslova's goal.
Once a typological variable and a collection of languages has been fixed, the workflow is as follows:
1. Infer a (distribution of) phylogeny(ies) from lexical data.
2. Estimate the transition matrix between the values of the variable.
3. Calculate the equilibrium distribution of this Markov process.
I conducted two case studies: (A) The major word order types, using WALS, and (B) case marking alignment patterns, using the data from Bickel et al., 2014. In both studies, I used the ASJP database (Wichmann et al., 2016) for the first step.
In (B), we found substantial differences between equilibrium and observed values. The corresponding results for (A), however, suggest that equilibrium has been reached.